|
Pressing
Problems
We have a lot to
feel good about but our County has
Pressing Problems that our District 2 and some other Commissioners
either cannot see or are ignoring. They seem to occupy themselves with
pet projects and minor situations while the big ones continue to grow
out of control. In fact, most of the bad news of 2007 was known
of and could have been avoided or lessened had the Board of County
Commissioners planned and set their spending priorities properly.
After
reviewing just a few of the following examples, we can all agree that
2008 is the
voters’ year to develop a new leadership team and vision that
will restore your Trust in our Board of County Commissioners.
Poor Leadership
Hobbles the County
The
County Commission seems almost paralyzed by the challenge of managing
the fourth-largest county in the fourth-largest state. Members do not
bring the right skill sets to the table and resist looking for solutions
that would stretch beyond the next election or the county line. They
are caught up in their own pet projects and small potatoes like sports,
toll booths, nickel-and-diming the infrastructure – instead of the
strategies that move our county forward. They lose sight of the big
picture. And a transportation plan that District 2 Commissioner
conceived will worsen sprawl in the very suburbs already crawling with
traffic, and add stress to the environment in a county struggling to
generate new water supplies. Is anyone in charge?
St
Petersburg Times, EDITORIAL Published August 21, 2007 read
the article
Steep Drop Predicted for Home Prices
"This is the most severe housing recession since the post-World War II
period," Several reasons: overbuilding by home builders, investors
leaving the area, and a fair amount of sub-prime mortgage loans causing
an increase in foreclosures. The height of the housing boom was in
2004-05 and speculative activity was rampant causing prices to surge
much higher than other regions.
Reuters Posted: 2007-12-06
read the article
Audit
Troubled Water Agency
After
almost 10 years since Tampa Bay Water was formed, the three major
alternative water projects (Desal plant, reservoir, treatment facility)
are not performing as promised. We've been allowing growth for years
based on the timing of these facilities being fully on line. Now we
have the growth, but we don’t have the water. We will be forced to
increase groundwater pumping again and that will kill our wetlands and
lakes.
The Tampa
Tribune, Published: September 10, 2007
read the article
Moffitt deal exposed
weak leadership
The County
commissioners’ debate on whether to go after the bioscience industry was
less about fiscal policy than leadership - who has it and who doesn't.
District 2 Commissioner criticized Tampa Mayor’s contribution even
though it was nearly two-thirds more than a package he celebrated only
weeks ago as "exciting" and "prominent." But the Moffitt debate was a
troubling glimpse of his poor capacity to think in visionary terms and
being rattled by the demands of managing a diverse, growing community.
St.
Petersburg Times Published Feb 26, 2007
read the article
Is Florida Over?
"It's just not the
place I originally moved to. You've got overcrowded roads. The utilities
are higher now. Taxes are unreasonable. Everything in Florida is more
expensive." The state became a place for rampant speculation that more
than doubled prices in a four-year period. Florida housing prices force
people to look elsewhere. Florida is also dealing with new competition.
The South's less-expensive, relatively warm states have been reaching
out to seniors and fiddling with their tax laws to attract them.
The Wall
Street Journal Published
September 29, 2007
read the
article
Let development depend
on the availability of water
We have a serious
water shortage because of growth and natural conditions. Current demand
is reduced by restricting homeowners and commercial users. Future
demand caused by new developments can also be reduced without
sacrificing our economic well being. We don't need to stop all
development, but instead use the same approach as we do with current
users. That is, approve the usual number of building permits when there
is plenty of water, but restrict permits when water supplies fall off.
It spreads both good times and bad times equally among all members of
our community and satisfies the concurrency test. It takes Tampa Bay
Water out of its crisis mode by allowing it to catch up and stay even
with future demand. It also demonstrates to future residents and
businesses that we can make hard but reasoned decisions that ensure our
continued quality of life.
St.
Petersburg Times, Published Feb 11, 2001
read
the article
Citizens
Deserve A Voice
Developers pushed the County Commissioners to put two more developers on
our City – County Planning Commission, so they can gain a clear
majority. Comprehensive Plan amendments that they approve will line
developers' pockets while putting taxpayers on the hook for expensive
infrastructure, and sticking us with more traffic-jamming sprawl.
Citizens will lose confidence in the process and in our elected
officials who rigged the system.
Tampa
Tribune, Published: September 19, 2007
read the article
A vote against public
safety
The four member
majority talk endlessly about fiscal responsibility, public safety and
first responders. But the first chance they get they weaken the
programs that help our families and children become stable and in the
process reduce the demand and costs of our courts and government.
St.
Petersburg Times Published Oct 4, 2006
read the article |